PR should never pay bloggers, right? Never say never…

July 19, 2011

Blogger outreach

The Evo Conference shined a spotlight on an issue that PR can't turn away from any longer -- paid relationships with bloggers. (Image credit: alittleoftheother.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The “Is it ok for PR to pay bloggers” debate took an interesting turn earlier this month at EVO Conference. Actually, it didn’t really take a turn at all. From what I gather (I wasn’t there, so getting it all secondhand), one of the sessions just shined some light on an issue that has existed for a while and is not going away anytime soon.

The shining light stemmed form a presentation Aveda gave about a blogger campaign for one of their top selling products. Basically, Aveda highlighted all they were asking the bloggers to do as part of that campaign and then followed it up by saying the brand is taking a stand against monetary compensation for bloggers. Here’s a great post from a Loralee, a blogger who was at the conference and watched the discussion play out.

If you read the post and the comments that follow it or you just discuss this issue with PR folks and bloggers, a couple of things come to light:

  1.  When people discuss the issue, they are often talking about different situations. For example, so many people hear paying bloggers and immediately generalize that into paying for a post and telling the blogger what to say. Uh, no. That’s not what most companies are doing when they enter paid relationships with bloggers. And it’s not the compensation I’ve heard most bloggers say they are looking for. The Aveda project was different because it was much more involved than one post. It was a month-long project that required “use of Twitter and Facebook, 4 blog posts and a youtube video.” Those are the kind of brand ambassador relationships many, but not all, bloggers think should require monetary compensation. As Loralee put it, “as awesome as their shampoo is, you can’t pay your grocery bill in shampoo.”
  2. There is no universal rule when it comes to PR paying bloggers. For instance, although it seems like Social Media Explorer’s Jason Falls is more of the opinion that PR is about earned media, he still said at BlogWorld that “there’s no right way, only a right way for you.” And emphasized that disclosure and FTC compliance has to be a piece of the puzzle. If you read Loralee’s post, you’ll see that same sentiment. Paying bloggers may work for one brand, but another. This blogger but not that blogger. Remember our conversations about influence? How about social media measurement? There is no silver bullet, people. If you want one, I hear Coors Light has a bitchin’ new cooler box.

This is a topic PR and bloggers need to keep discussing. And we need to stop saying that paid relationships with bloggers are never going to happen. Because let me remind you of other times PR has said never in the past:

  • We said the physical newspaper would never go away. And it hasn’t….yet.
  • We said we wouldn’t consider bloggers as real media. Hmm, want to rethink that one now?
  • We said Facebook would never be a tool we we used for anything other than goofing off. Might have missed that one by just a bit.
  • We said we would never be able to pitch effectively without automated tools that help us create huge media lists. These days that non-automated tool called your brain and its friend research are a lot more effective.
  • We said executives should never be put “out there” without a PR person close by and that employees should never represent the brand unless they are in PR. Now granted, some execs still should never be out there :) . But many brands’ perceptions have taken a positive turn because their execs (e.g JetBlue, Dominos) and employees (e.g Best Buy, Dell) have connected directly with customers.

And now, many PR pros are saying we should never pay bloggers. But at the same time, some brands are entering paid relationships with bloggers now. And there will be PR pros who pay bloggers in the future. So let’s stop acting all high and mighty and calling this issue open and shut, or making even more sweeping generalizations like that it’s unethical.

Instead, let’s call it what it is. An evolution. One we as PR pros need to keep our eye on. Otherwise we aren’t doing our jobs.

Related posts:

, , , , , , , , ,
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Shonali 1161 pts

Thank you for a balanced viewpoint as always, Justin. #thatisall

commammo 20 pts

JGoldsborough as long as the blogger understands his/her legal responsibilities that result from getting paid, no problem. I wrote a paper about how the new law applies that might be helpful. http://bit.ly/commammo11-16 Well, the post might be enough, unless you want to be dazzled by my research :-)

When the blogger considers him/herself a journalist. You can't pretend to be unbiased if you've been paid to write by the subject of your material. If you're actually consulting (conducting a campaign, for example), I don't see an issue with paying.

Hope all's well, and that you haven't melted entirely in the preposterous heat. Sorry about the Royals, btw.

Sean

JGoldsborough 239 pts moderator

commammo Thanks for stopping by and sharing your research. Yes, the Royals are pretty much always sorry :).

Here's an example of an integration post (sponsored) that we did for our client Hallmark. First, note again that 5 percent or less of the blogger outreach we do for this client is paid. Second, the integration includes multiple posts and sharing content via other social channels. It is NOT just for one post. It's a brand ambassador relationship.

Third, here is the post. Notice the disclosure from the blogger up front at the start of the post in italics. And then notice the awesome job of storytelling she does and the 600-plus comments. Interesting example: http://www.kellehampton.com/2011/07/get-carded.html

notasupermom 12 pts

Good perspective. I was at the session in question and I think if a differentiation had been made between editorial and sponsored posts, the conversation wouldn't have been so heated.

JGoldsborough 239 pts moderator

notasupermom Good point, I could see that. I also think that spirited conversations like that are going to happen as different viewpoints collide and things begin to change. The point is not that it makes sense for PR to pay bloggers in all situations going forward. The point is that in some specific situations for certain brands, it might. Cheers!

jspepper 16 pts

Nicely done, although the panel was a bit heated because of the way Aveda presented their new "stance" ... which never was clarified, and is still a way to take advantage of a community.

He also liked to say Never a lot - never say never. With earned media dying - and that's just a sad fact - we are moving to something new. And some agencies will be dragged crying and screaming, or be left behind.

JGoldsborough 239 pts moderator

jspepper Agree, we should never say never. No one can possibly see far enough into the future to say never. My mentor used to counsel our senior execs of that very fact. PR pros need to realize that we can have a viewpoint on this, but we are not necessarily in control. I know PR pros that said we should never engage directly with customers via social media either. How did that "stance" turn out?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] PR Should Never Pay Bloggers, Right? Never Say Never (Jul 19, [...]